Asset Allocation for $500K+ Earners: Model Portfolios & Tax Strategy

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment, tax, or financial advice. All investing involves risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult qualified financial and tax professionals before making investment decisions.

---

Why High Earners Can—and Should—Think Differently About Asset Allocation

If you earn $500,000 or more annually, the standard asset allocation advice doesn’t apply to you.

The typical framework—“60/40 stocks/bonds” or “100 minus your age in stocks”—was designed for workers with modest incomes and limited financial cushions. You have neither limitation. Your high income provides a stable cash flow that functions like a bond in your overall financial picture. Your ability to save aggressively means you can weather market downturns without selling at the bottom.

This creates both an opportunity and a responsibility. The opportunity: you can take more intelligent risk than conventional advice suggests. The responsibility: you face complexities that average investors don’t—concentrated stock positions, tax optimization across account types, and access to investments most people can’t buy.

Done right, your asset allocation becomes a competitive advantage. Done wrong, you leave hundreds of thousands of dollars on the table over your career.

---

Quick Reference: Asset Allocation Framework

Net Worth Level	Recommended Equity Allocation	Alternatives	Key Focus
$0-500K	90-95%	0%	Maximize savings rate; keep it simple
$500K-1M	85-90%	0-5%	Build diversified core; start tax optimization
$1M-3M	80-90%	5-10%	Reduce company stock; asset location matters
$3M-10M	70-85%	10-20%	Consider alternatives; estate planning begins
$10M+	60-80%	15-25%	Wealth preservation; multi-generational planning

These are starting points for someone with a stable high income. Adjust based on your specific risk tolerance, career stability, and financial goals.

---

The Human Capital Framework

Your most valuable asset isn’t in your portfolio—it’s your future earning capacity.

What Is Human Capital?

Human capital is the present value of your future earnings. A 35-year-old physician earning $400,000 annually with 30 years of career ahead has human capital worth roughly $6-8 million (discounted for time and risk).

This matters for asset allocation because human capital has risk characteristics:

Bond-Like Human Capital (stable, predictable):

• Tenured professors, government employees
• Physicians in high-demand specialties
• Engineers at stable corporations
• Most W-2 employees at large companies

Stock-Like Human Capital (variable, market-correlated):

• Investment bankers, hedge fund professionals
• Tech workers with heavy equity compensation
• Salespeople on commission
• Entrepreneurs and business owners

Why This Matters for Your Portfolio

If your human capital is bond-like, your investment portfolio can be more aggressive. You have a stable “bond” already—you don’t need another one in your portfolio.

If your human capital is stock-like, you need more portfolio stability to offset career volatility.

Example: Two 35-year-olds with $1 million portfolios:

• Physician (stable $400K salary, minimal market correlation): Can hold 90% stocks
• Investment Banker (variable $600K compensation, high market correlation): Should hold 60-70% stocks

The banker’s income falls when markets fall—exactly when they might need to tap their portfolio. The physician’s income is stable regardless of market conditions.

---

Why Traditional Rules Fail High Earners

The “100 Minus Age” Problem

The rule says a 40-year-old should hold 60% stocks. But this ignores:

1. Human capital: A 40-year-old with 25+ years of high earnings ahead has enormous implicit bond exposure
2. Savings rate: High earners add significant new capital annually, reducing sequence-of-returns risk
3. Time horizon: Your actual time horizon extends beyond retirement—you’re building generational wealth
4. Tax efficiency: More aggressive allocations in tax-advantaged accounts can be more appropriate

What the data shows: For high earners with stable income and long time horizons, equity allocations of 80-95% in early/mid-career have historically produced superior risk-adjusted returns compared to conservative allocations.

The 60/40 Portfolio’s Limitations

The traditional 60% stock / 40% bond allocation was designed for retirees needing income stability. For a high earner in their 30s or 40s:

• You don’t need portfolio income—your salary covers expenses
• You can tolerate short-term volatility—you’re not selling to fund lifestyle
• Bonds have historically underperformed stocks—especially after inflation and taxes
• Your time horizon is 30+ years—long enough for equities to recover from any downturn

A 60/40 portfolio for a high-earning 35-year-old is essentially leaving money on the table.

---

Model Portfolios by Wealth Level

These models assume stable, bond-like human capital. Adjust more conservatively if your income is variable or market-correlated.

Level 1: Building the Foundation ($0-500K)

Target Allocation:

Asset Class	Allocation	Implementation
US Total Stock Market	55%	VTI, FSKAX, SWTSX
International Developed	25%	VXUS, FSPSX
Emerging Markets	10%	VWO, FPADX
Bonds	10%	BND, FXNAX

Key Principles:

• Keep it simple—don’t over-optimize with small balances
• Maximize tax-advantaged contributions first
• Use low-cost index funds (expense ratios under 0.10%)
• Automate contributions; ignore daily fluctuations

Account Priority:

1. 401(k) up to employer match
2. HSA (if available)
3. 401(k) to maximum
4. Backdoor Roth IRA
5. Taxable brokerage

Level 2: Accelerating Growth ($500K-1M)

Target Allocation:

Asset Class	Allocation	Implementation
US Total Stock Market	50%	VTI, FSKAX
International Developed	20%	VXUS, IXUS
Emerging Markets	10%	VWO, IEMG
Small-Cap Value	5%	VBR, AVUV
REITs	5%	VNQ (in tax-advantaged only)
Bonds	10%	BND, AGG

Key Principles:

• Begin asset location optimization (see section below)
• Address any company stock concentration
• Consider factor tilts (small-cap value) for long-term outperformance
• Start building taxable brokerage with tax-efficient holdings

New Considerations:

• If company stock exceeds 20% of net worth, create a diversification plan
• Use tax-loss harvesting opportunities in taxable accounts
• Review beneficiary designations annually

Level 3: Building Sophistication ($1M-3M)

Target Allocation:

Asset Class	Allocation	Implementation
US Total Stock Market	40%	VTI, individual stocks tax-loss harvested
International Developed	18%	VXUS, IXUS
Emerging Markets	8%	VWO, IEMG
Small-Cap Value	7%	AVUV, VBR
Real Estate (REITs + direct)	7%	VNQ, direct property
Alternatives	5%	Private credit, GP stakes (if accessible)
Bonds/Fixed Income	15%	Munis (taxable), TIPS (tax-advantaged)

Key Principles:

• Asset location becomes critical at this level
• Diversify away from company stock systematically
• Consider municipal bonds in taxable accounts (tax-exempt income)
• Evaluate direct real estate for income and diversification

New Considerations:

• Estate planning documents (will, trust, powers of attorney)
• Liability insurance (umbrella policy)
• Donor-advised fund for charitable giving optimization

Level 4: Wealth Preservation ($3M-10M)

Target Allocation:

Asset Class	Allocation	Implementation
US Equities	35%	VTI, direct indexing
International Equities	15%	VXUS, international direct indexing
Emerging Markets	5%	VWO, emerging market funds
Small-Cap/Factor Tilts	10%	AVUV, DFAT
Real Estate	10%	REITs, direct property, real estate funds
Alternatives	10%	PE, private credit, hedge funds
Fixed Income	15%	Munis, TIPS, I-bonds

Key Principles:

• Direct indexing allows for customized tax-loss harvesting
• Alternative investments become accessible and potentially valuable
• Consider trusts for wealth transfer and asset protection
• Coordinate estate planning with investment strategy

New Considerations:

• Qualified opportunity zone investments for capital gains
• Charitable remainder trusts for concentrated stock positions
• Family office or multi-family office for coordination
• Gifting strategies (annual exclusion, 529 superfunding)

Level 5: Generational Wealth ($10M+)

At this level, allocation becomes highly individualized. General principles:

• Preservation focus: Shift from growing wealth to preserving it
• Alternative access: Quality PE, VC, and hedge funds become more accessible and can add value
• Tax optimization: Structures like GRATs, IDGTs, and family partnerships become relevant
• Diversification across everything: Geographies, currencies, asset classes, managers
• Professional management: This level typically requires a family office or high-quality RIA

---

Tax-Efficient Asset Location

Asset location means placing investments in the right account types to minimize taxes. At high marginal rates (35-37% federal plus state), this optimization adds significant value.

The Core Principle

• Tax-inefficient assets → Tax-advantaged accounts (401k, IRA)
• Tax-efficient assets → Taxable accounts (brokerage)

What Goes Where

Asset Type	Best Location	Why
Bonds (taxable)	401k, Traditional IRA	Interest taxed as ordinary income
REITs	401k, Traditional IRA	Dividends taxed as ordinary income
High-turnover funds	401k, IRA	Frequent distributions create tax drag
Total stock index funds	Taxable	Mostly qualified dividends, low turnover
Growth stocks	Taxable	No dividends, long-term capital gains only
International stocks	Taxable	Foreign tax credit recoverable
Municipal bonds	Taxable	Already tax-exempt

Location Example: $1.5M Portfolio

Account	Value	Holdings	Rationale
401(k)	$600K	Bonds, REITs, international (no tax credit)	Shelter high-tax assets
Roth IRA	$150K	Small-cap value, high-growth	Tax-free forever; hold highest expected return
Taxable	$750K	Total stock market, international	Tax-efficient; harvest losses

Quantifying the Benefit

Academic research suggests optimal asset location adds 0.3-0.75% annually to after-tax returns. Over 30 years, that’s the difference between $3.2M and $4.1M on a $1M starting balance.

---

Company Stock Concentration: The High Earner’s Biggest Risk

If you work in tech, finance, or any industry with equity compensation, concentrated stock positions are likely your largest portfolio risk.

Why Concentration Is Dangerous

Career correlation: When your company struggles, you might lose your job AND see your stock plummet—the worst possible timing.

False confidence: Watching your stock 10x over five years creates an emotional attachment that clouds judgment.

Historical precedent: Employees of Enron, Lehman Brothers, and countless other companies lost both their jobs and retirement savings simultaneously.

Concentration Thresholds

Concentration Level	Risk Assessment	Recommended Action
Under 10%	Acceptable	Monitor; diversify opportunistically
10-20%	Elevated	Create 2-3 year diversification plan
20-35%	High	Diversify aggressively; consider 10b5-1 plan
Over 35%	Extreme	Immediate action required

Diversification Strategies

10b5-1 Trading Plan: Pre-scheduled sales that protect you from insider trading concerns and remove emotion from timing decisions.

Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT): Donate concentrated stock, receive income stream, avoid capital gains. Works best for charitable-minded investors with significant gains.

Exchange Funds: Swap concentrated stock for diversified fund shares without triggering capital gains. Requires 7-year holding period; complex but effective.

Protective Puts / Collars: Options strategies that limit downside while allowing upside participation. Useful for temporary protection.

Simply Selling: For many high earners, just selling 10-20% annually is the simplest approach. Yes, you’ll pay capital gains tax—but diversification is worth the cost.

Case Study: The FAANG Engineer

Situation: 35-year-old engineering manager at major tech company with $800,000 in vested company stock (65% of $1.2M net worth). Annual RSU grants of $200,000.

Problem: Career and portfolio are both concentrated in one company and one sector.

Strategy:

1. Immediate: Set up 10b5-1 plan to sell 25% of vested stock annually ($200K/year)
2. Ongoing: Sell all new RSU vests immediately upon vesting (supplemental rate withholding)
3. Target: Reduce company stock to under 15% within 3 years
4. Reinvest: Into diversified total market index funds across accounts

Result in 3 years:

• Company stock: ~$300K (20% of projected $1.5M net worth)
• Diversified portfolio: ~$1.2M across accounts
• Career risk no longer correlated with portfolio risk

---

Factor Investing for High Earners

Factor investing tilts portfolios toward characteristics associated with higher long-term returns. The most robust factors are:

The Five Robust Factors

Factor	Description	Historical Premium	Best Access
Market (beta)	Stocks vs. cash	~5-6%/year	Total stock market funds
Size	Small-cap outperformance	~2-3%/year	Small-cap value funds
Value	Cheap stocks vs. expensive	~3-4%/year	Value funds (VTV, AVUV)
Profitability	High-quality companies	~3%/year	Quality factor funds
Momentum	Recent winners continue	~4-5%/year	Momentum ETFs (MTUM)

Should You Tilt?

Arguments for factor tilts:

• Long time horizon allows you to capture premiums despite volatility
• Tax-advantaged accounts minimize turnover costs
• Modest tilts add diversification within equities

Arguments against:

• Factors can underperform for 10+ years (value from 2010-2020)
• Adds complexity without guaranteed benefit
• Fees slightly higher than pure market-cap indexing

A Sensible Approach

If you choose to factor-tilt:

• Keep market beta as your core (70-80% of equities)
• Add small-cap value as primary tilt (10-15%)
• Consider quality/profitability as secondary tilt (5-10%)
• Hold factor tilts in tax-advantaged accounts (higher turnover)
• Expect periods of underperformance—stay the course

Recommended funds: Avantis (AVUV, AVDV), DFA, Vanguard factor funds

---

Alternative Investments: Opportunity or Distraction?

High earners increasingly have access to private equity, venture capital, hedge funds, and private credit through their employers, wealth managers, or accredited investor platforms.

The Reality Check

Most alternatives underperform a simple stock/bond portfolio after fees. The average hedge fund, average private equity fund, and average VC fund all trail public markets over most periods.

But the best alternatives can add value:

• Top-quartile PE/VC funds have historically outperformed by 3-5% annually
• Private credit provides income with different risk characteristics
• Some hedge fund strategies provide true diversification

The challenge: consistently accessing top-quartile managers is nearly impossible for individual investors.

When Alternatives Make Sense

• Net worth exceeds $3M (can afford illiquidity)
• You have access to quality managers (employer program, top wealth manager)
• You can commit for 7-10 years (no liquidity needed)
• You’ve maximized tax-advantaged accounts (alternatives rarely tax-efficient)
• You understand what you’re buying (read the docs, know the fees)

Practical Alternative Allocation

Net Worth	Alternative Target	Types to Consider
Under $1M	0%	Focus on index funds
$1-3M	0-5%	Private credit funds; real estate
$3-10M	5-15%	Add PE co-investments, VC if accessible
$10M+	10-25%	Full alternative suite with quality managers

Where to Access Alternatives

• Employer programs: Many large companies offer PE/VC access in 401(k) or separate vehicles
• Wealth managers: RIAs and private banks with $1M+ minimums often have fund access
• Platforms: Fundrise, Yieldstreet, Moonfare, iCapital for smaller minimums (varying quality)
• Direct investment: Real estate syndications, angel investing (highest risk, requires expertise)

---

Rebalancing: The Discipline That Matters

Rebalancing maintains your target allocation and systematically “sells high, buys low.” For high earners, how you rebalance matters as much as whether you do.

Rebalancing Triggers

Use threshold-based rather than calendar-based rebalancing:

Approach	Description	Best For
5% bands	Rebalance when any asset class drifts 5+ points	Most investors
10% bands	Rebalance when drift exceeds 10 points	Tax-sensitive, low-touch
Annual	Rebalance once per year regardless	Simple, works fine

Tax-Efficient Rebalancing for High Earners

Don’t sell in taxable accounts to rebalance. Instead:

1. Direct new contributions to underweight assets
2. Use RSU sales to bring equities down (selling anyway)
3. Rebalance within tax-advantaged accounts (no tax consequences)
4. Harvest losses to offset any necessary taxable sales

Example: Portfolio is 80% stocks, 20% bonds. Target is 75/25.

• Don’t: Sell $50K of stocks, pay $7,500 in taxes
• Do: Direct next $50K of contributions to bonds; rebalance within 401(k)

When to Deviate

Sometimes deviation from target makes sense:

• After major crash: Stocks down 30%+ may warrant staying the course rather than selling bonds to rebalance (sequence risk)
• Approaching major purchase: Reduce equity temporarily if buying home within 1-2 years
• Approaching retirement: Begin gradual shift toward preservation

---

Case Study: The Dual-Income Tech Household

Profile

• Ages: Both 38
• Household income: $950,000 (both work at tech companies)
• Net worth: $2.8 million
  • 401(k)s: $800K
  • Roth IRAs: $150K
  • Taxable brokerage: $600K
  • Company stock (both companies): $950K (34% of net worth)
  • Real estate equity: $300K
• Risk tolerance: High (stable dual income, long horizon)
• Current allocation: 90% equities, but heavily concentrated in tech

The Problems

1. Company stock concentration: 34% in two tech stocks—career and portfolio aligned
2. Sector concentration: Tech accounts for 60%+ of equity holdings
3. No alternatives exposure: Missing diversification available at their wealth level
4. Suboptimal asset location: Bonds in taxable, growth stocks in 401(k)

The Optimized Allocation

Target allocation:

Asset Class	Target %	Current	Change
Broad US Equities	35%	25%	+10%
International	18%	10%	+8%
Small-Cap Value	7%	2%	+5%
Company Stock	12%	34%	-22%
Real Estate	10%	11%	—%
Alternatives	5%	0%	+5%
Bonds/Fixed	13%	18%	-5%

Implementation plan:

1. Year 1:

   • Set up 10b5-1 plans to sell $300K company stock annually (each spouse)
   • Redirect all new RSU vests to immediate sale
   • Open donor-advised fund; contribute appreciated stock
   • Rebalance 401(k) holdings to optimize asset location

2. Year 2-3:

   • Continue systematic diversification
   • Explore employer PE/VC access for 5% alternatives allocation
   • Consider direct real estate investment as concentration decreases

3. Ongoing:

   • Annual rebalancing review
   • Tax-loss harvesting in taxable accounts
   • Maintain company stock under 15% permanently

Projected Outcome

• Reduced single-company risk from 34% to under 15%
• Improved diversification across sectors and geographies
• Better tax efficiency through asset location
• Modest alternatives exposure for additional diversification
• Still high equity allocation appropriate for age and income stability

---

Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Being Too Conservative Because of High Net Worth

Having $3 million doesn’t mean you need a 60/40 portfolio. If you’re 40 with stable income and 25+ years until retirement, you can still hold 80%+ equities. Wealth preservation focus comes later.

2. Letting Company Stock Accumulate Unchecked

“It’s worked so far” is not an investment thesis. Create a systematic diversification plan and stick to it regardless of stock performance.

3. Ignoring Asset Location

Holding bonds in your taxable account while keeping index funds in your 401(k) costs you real money every year. Optimize placement based on tax characteristics.

4. Chasing Alternative Investments Before Basics

Don’t invest in PE or hedge funds until you’ve maxed tax-advantaged accounts and built a diversified liquid portfolio. Alternatives are a complement, not a substitute.

5. Rebalancing in Taxable Accounts

Every time you sell winners to buy losers in a taxable account, you trigger capital gains taxes. Use new contributions and tax-advantaged accounts to rebalance.

6. Overcomplicating With Too Many Holdings

You don’t need 15 different funds. A core three-fund portfolio (US, international, bonds) works fine. Complexity adds little value but creates real tracking burden.

7. Timing the Market With High Income

“I’ll wait for a pullback to invest” is statistically a losing strategy. Your time in the market beats timing the market—especially when you have decades of compound growth ahead.

---

Action Steps

This Week

• Calculate your current allocation across all accounts
• Determine your company stock concentration percentage
• Review your 401(k) investment options for asset location optimization

This Month

• Create target allocation based on your human capital and risk tolerance
• Set up automatic rebalancing in tax-advantaged accounts if available
• If company stock exceeds 20%, begin creating a diversification plan

This Quarter

• Optimize asset location across account types
• Implement 10b5-1 trading plan if needed for concentrated stock
• Review factor tilt options in tax-advantaged accounts

Annually

• Rebalance to targets (preferably through contributions)
• Tax-loss harvest in taxable accounts
• Review overall allocation as life circumstances change
• Evaluate alternative investment opportunities at higher wealth levels

---

Additional Resources

Books

• The Elements of Investing by Malkiel & Ellis — Foundational investing principles
• The Only Investment Guide You’ll Ever Need by Andrew Tobias — Practical wisdom
• Your Complete Guide to Factor-Based Investing by Berkin & Swedroe — Deep dive on factors

Research

• Vanguard Research — Asset allocation studies
• Dimensional Fund Advisors — Factor investing research
• AQR Insights — Alternative investments and factors

Tools

• Portfolio Visualizer — Backtesting and analysis
• Personal Capital — Free portfolio tracking and allocation
• Morningstar X-Ray — Holdings analysis

Tax Code References

• IRC Section 1031 — Like-kind exchanges (real estate)
• IRC Section 1400Z — Qualified opportunity zones
• IRC Section 664 — Charitable remainder trusts

---

This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment, tax, or financial advice. All investing involves risk, including potential loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The allocations and strategies discussed may not be appropriate for your specific situation. Always consult with qualified financial and tax professionals before making investment decisions.